The Disability Discrimination Act makes it unlawful for providers of goods, facilities or services to discriminate against members of the public on the grounds of disability.
The protection extends to anyone who is disabled, ie someone with "a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities."
The definitions of discrimination are similar to those used when it comes to employing disabled people. It is unlawful for service providers to discriminate against a disabled person by:
In this context, less favourable treatment is described by the act as:
Service providers must make "reasonable" adjustments. Legally, they must take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances in the following three areas:
Where a physical feature makes it impossible or unreasonably difficult for disabled people to access services you must take reasonable steps to provide a reasonable alternative method of making the services available. From 1 October 2004 it is a requirement to consider other ways of overcoming a physical feature: such as removing it, altering it, or providing a reasonable means of avoiding it.
Service providers are not required to take any steps which would fundamentally alter the nature of their business.
Providing information in Braille or on audio tape are examples of providing an auxiliary aid or service. Service providers should take reasonable steps to provide such aids where it would enable disabled people to access services, or make it easier for them to do so. What is appropriate depends on the circumstances. For small restaurants it may be more appropriate to read a menu to a partially sighted customer but a large, well-resourced restaurant might be expected to go further and provide a menu in Braille.
How you go about your business may, unwittingly, make it impossible or unreasonably difficult for a disabled person to gain access to your services. For example, a policy that male diners must wear a collar and tie might exclude customers with skin complaints, or a policy to ban dogs might exclude a blind customer.
To avoid such discrimination, service providers have to take reasonable steps to change the relevant practice, policy or procedure so that it is no longer has the discriminatory effect, for example by instructing staff to waive the policy in certain cases, to amend it, or abandon it altogether.
Adjustments do not need be made if they are not reasonable. Cost will be a factor in assessing what is reasonable, but it is not the only factor. The following list gives examples of considerations for deciding whether it would be reasonable to make an adjustment:
Service providers with substantial financial resources would generally be expected to do more.
There are five potential grounds of justification:
A failure to comply could result in a claim for unlawful discrimination. A claimant can bring civil proceedings. Legal sanctions will result if the disabled person is successful. Also, there is always the threat that litigation will be accompanied by bad publicity.
If successful in court, the disabled person could be awarded compensation for any loss, including injury to feelings. They could also seek a court order to prevent the service provider repeating any discriminatory act in the future.
If an employee of a service provider unlawfully discriminates against a disabled person, the service provider unlawfully discriminates against a disabled person. Service provider will be liable unless they can show they took reasonable steps to prevent it.
Therefore you should consider establishing the following:
by Jonathan Exten-Wright
Jonathan Exten-Wright is a partner in the employment department of lawyers DLA.
You can get further practical advice on accessibility issues from the English Tourism Council's business-to-business Web site accessibletourism.org.uk